Mathematically Defined Crypto-Currencies

· Blog Posts, Essays
Authors

There has been a lot of attention on BitCoin of late, and a number of my correspondents have been digging into the topic.

I was looking for some good analogies through which to understand the idea and the dynamics of BitCoin and similar mathematically defined crypto-currencies. This is my first shot at constructing such an analogy.

In this model, I think of the economy (the exchange of goods and services) to be an intricate clockwork mechanism. Everything is connected to everything else. Energy flows through the gears, allowing the machinery to operate at some level of speed and efficiency to move things along.

Any economy, like any clockwork mechanism, has friction. Energy needs to be supplied to overcome the friction, and that energy eventually degrades to heat as the state of the clockwork mechanism evolves over time.

One can improve the efficiency of the machine by applying a high quality lubricant. With a good lubricant, there is less friction, and less energy is needed to drive the machine.

In an economy, money is the lubricant that allows the machinery of commerce to operate efficiently. That’s the function of money: to act as a lubricant for the gears of the economy.

Suppose an inventor devises a super-lubricant that outperforms all current lubrication technologies. What happens? In an ideal world, everyone upgrades to the new lubricant and it soon takes a lot less energy to keep the clockwork machine running smoothly.

What could possibly go wrong?

The problem is that manufacturing the new lubricant is not free. Just as it takes energy to overcome friction, it also takes time and energy to manufacture the super-lubricant. And so there ensues a “gold rush” to manufacture this wonderful new super-lubricant.

Eventually, those who got in the game early end up owning barrels and barrels of this valuable super-lubricant. The problem is, they are not using it to lubricate the mechanism. Rather they are hoarding it because its market value is rising. As a result there is a shortage of lubricant in the clockwork mechanism. The material economy is not yet benefiting from the new super-lubricant because very little of it is being released into the gears of the machine. Most of it is simply being hoarded in privately owned barrels whose value on paper is rising.

But if and when all that hoarded lubricant is released into the clockwork machinery of the real economy, two interesting things will happen. The real economy will operate more efficiently (and that’s a good thing) while the price (or value) of the (now increasingly abundant) super-lubricant will drop. When that happens, the late-comers to the gold rush game will find that they unwisely spent a lot of resources in vain to manufacture or purchase small amounts of the once scarce lubricant that has now become cheap and plentiful.

Does this analogy work? How can it be refined or improved?

2 Comments

Comments RSS
  1. Ellie K

    Good try. The lubricant analogy reveals your (laudatory) electrical engineering background. Electrical circuits have resistance, not to mention Maxwell’s demon running around too. When used as a medium of exchange, bitcoin does too i,e. transactions cost and time delay, much like Western Union and $US. Of course, the magnitude of both (Xfr cost and time) are less for bitcoin than WUnion. Unlike WU, bitcoin is anonymous, sort of. Although you don’t identify yourself by name, activity is traceable through the blockchain, whatever that means.

    Okay, what does this remind you of? ESR, the Bazar, p2p, Tim O’Reilly, Jimbo’s Wikipedia and the Open everything movement? (i was reading your prior post, and the Aeon one. I’ve thought similarly, that Open eventually converges on neo-liberalism and privatization.) Anyway, as they say, bitcoin frees ussers from the Federal Reserve and fiat currency enslavement. Instead of wire Xfer’ing $US by ACH, your bitcoins will be debited from an e-wallet in escrow with Mt. Gox. You know how that ended though. Otherwise, you are correct about the advantage accruing to early participants a la Ponzi. Some call it a reward for early adopters. Also, there is a max of ~ 26 billion, or maybe million, bitcoins that can be mined, and a few other twists like collusion.

    P.S. I liked knol too! It is long gone :~

    • rivkafreeman

      You have to ask Peter Schiff if your analogy is correct.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: